Rexx Execution Speeds

 

 

Got a faster system? Benchmark it by running the Rexx program rexxcps, which you can

download from the Benchmarking section. Then send me the information to fill out all columns

in the chart and I'll add it. Im at webmasterA at the domain RexxInfo.org.

 

 

Year

Make

CPU

CPU Speed

RAM

OS

Rexx

Clauses Per Second (cps)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

Asus

Core i5

(i5-3550)

4*3.3 Ghz

16G

Linux Mint 13 (64 bit)

Regina

(64 bit)

5,018,821

 

Raspberry Pi

Arm 6

700 Mhz

256 M

Debian wheezy/sid

Regina 3.6

139,005

 

Samsung Galaxy
GT-P3110

Arm dual core

1 Ghz

 

687 M

Android 4.0.3

Brexx 2.1.9

664,218

2010

Lenovo

Core2 Duo

2*3.0 Ghz

4 G

Win 7

Regina

(64 bit)

4,545,455

 

Lenovo

Core2 Duo

2*3.0 Ghz

4 G

Win XP

ooRexx

4,761,905

 

HP

Dual-Core

2*2.5 Ghz

4 G

Ubuntu 10

Regina

4,088,419

 

HP

Dual-Core

2*2.5 Ghz

4 G

Win XP

Regina

3,296,703

 

HP

Dual-Core

2*2.5 Ghz

4 G

Ubuntu 10

ooRexx

2,890,901

2005

white box

Pent IV

3.4 Ghz

1 G

Win 2003

Regina

2,400,000

 

Sony

Pent IV

2.4 Ghz

1.5 G

Win XP

Regina

2,147,412

 

IBM

Pent IV

2.2 Ghz

768 M

Win 2000

Regina

1,800,000

 

white box

Celeron

2.6 Ghz

1 G

Win XP

BRexx

1,800,000

 

white box

Celeron

2.6 Ghz

1 G

Win XP

Regina

1,100,000

2001

Dell

Pent III

933 Mhz

512 M

Win XP

Regina

934,579

 

Dell

Pent III

933 Mhz

512 M

Ubuntu 9

Regina

645,492

 

Dell

Pent III

550 Mhz

512 M

Win 98SE

BRexx

612,245

1998

Gateway

Pent II

266 Mhz

256 M

Win 98SE

BRexx

325,000

 

Gateway

Pent II

266 Mhz

256 M

Win 98SE

Regina

225,000

 

Gateway

Pent II

266 Mhz

256 M

RedHat 8

Regina

180,000

1993

IBM

486/SX2

50 Mhz

20 M

Win 95

BRexx

11,500

 

clone

486/DX2

66 Mhz

8 M

Win 3.1

BRexx

8,200

 

clone

486/SX

25 Mhz

8 M

Win 3.1

BRexx

6,000

1988

clone

386/DX

25 Mhz

2 M

DOS 6.2

BRexx

3,600

1982

Zenith

8088-2

8 Mhz

640 K

DOS 6.2

Mansfield

95

 

IBM PC

8088

4.77 Mhz

320 K

DOS 6.2

Mansfield

70

 

Execution speeds vary by many other factors not listed (such as chip sets, cache sizes, operating system settings,

interpreter release, etc), so these results are representative rather than scientific. These numbers do not reflect

relative performance of the Rexx interpreters listed.